Téléchargement Gratuit Territorio Comanche Torrent livre ou tout simplement lire en ligne Territorio Comanche Torrent livre en format pdf et epub. Club \'Territorio Comanche\'. DOWNLOAD OR READ: TERRITORIO COMANCHE COMANCHE TERRITORY PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI. Page 1. Page 2. Page 2. Page 3. territorio comanche.
|Language:||English, Spanish, Indonesian|
|Genre:||Business & Career|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Sign up for free]|
By submitting your contact information, you consent to receive communication from Prezi containing information on Prezi's products. You can. Territorio Comanche portrays journalists as lost souls who have to fight for their pdf. Access options available: HTML; PDF Download PDF. Pérez-Reverte's Double Witnessing in Territorio Comanche. Erma Nezirevic. Romance Notes, Volume 57, Number 1, , pp. (Article). Published by The.
I do not consider all approaches, nor even the most typical ones. Some of the examples I shall focus on are Spanish, though they are discussed in an international context and in relation to theoretical issues. The main Spanish examples are literary, but the other central reference is a film, Before the Rain, directed by Milcho Manchevski in The main point of my argument is that both the novel and the film illustrate the need to move away from the epic representation of war, to avoid complicity with discourses which endow wars, and violence, with meaning.
The narrative poetics can thus be read as a commitment to a politics of representation that resists co-option by hegemonic explanations of the event, particularly those of the media but also those of historiography.
Both works — that of Goytisolo and that of Manchevski — position themselves at an intersection of discourses, allowing for fruitful discussion of the interactions between history, literature, journalism, photography, film and television in the representation of war.
The war story is ruled by a double and contradictory requirement: on the one hand, the need to tell, the ethical impetus of testimony, and, on the other, the impossibility of fully accounting for the kind of chaotic and traumatic experience the phenomenon of war entails.
Moreover, one of the oldest and most basic conventions of such eye-witness accounts of war is that true knowledge of the event can only come from experience. I think not. If you believe it, be skeptical. It is a question of credibility. While making claims to truth, the story retains its ambivalent status, as fiction and event appear unavoidably intertwined in the telling.
In spite of all these difficulties and contradictions, the story is told. Most people owe their knowledge of war, however inaccurate it may be, not to experience but to representation, to indirect means. It does not seem possible to approach and interpret such texts without taking into account the fact that they refer to a human experience.
The desire or the need to account for the experience of war illustrates the tension between history and story, between reality and fiction. Maybe we feel that there is something obscene in ignoring the reality of death, that it is an offence inflicted upon the dead, as if narrative responsibility were, in the case of the war story, accompanied by some form of moral responsibility.
However, Homer does not have to be a conscious model, and, particularly in the case of diaries and letters, most often it is not. According to Samuel Hynes: The stories that men tell of war belong to a curious class of writing. In most war narratives there is nothing to suggest that the author is aware of any previous example: no quotations or allusions or imitations of earlier models, and no evident knowledge of previous wars, or even of other theaters in the war that he is recalling. War writing, it seems, is a genre without a tradition to the men who write it.
Still, it has a place among established literary kinds: such writing, we might say, is something like travel writing, something like autobiography, something like history. And when we move beyond the corpus selected by Hynes to include fictional accounts, war poetry, historical documents and journalistic reports, it becomes even more evident that the tradition of the war story can be traced across several genres.
Also, the referential status of the works is very often ambivalent. Much of what is labelled as fiction is grounded in experience and historical event.
The same subject matter recurs in different formats, allowing for all sorts of interference between fiction and testimony, so that the format is not indifferent to our interpretation of the story and of the event.
Thus, what at first may look simply like a thematic common denominator for a wide variety of works, usually studied by several different disciplines, turns out to be a revealing vantage point for discussion of such fundamental theoretical issues as the relation between reality and narrative, between literature and history, between verbal narratives and other forms of representation, and between representation and ideology.
And the ideological debate can be summarized as, basically, the confrontation between epic and anti-epic perspectives. Just as we can say that war is one of the main driving forces in history, so we 32 Antonio Monegal can say that epic as a genre has preferred to narrate of the course of history in terms of military exploits. But the view we characterize as epic is ideologically biased, to the extent that it glorifies heroism and other similar values. This association between mode of representation and ideology reveals the breach between the event itself and a process of construction of meaning which wants to be identified with truth.
This relationship between war and language — or, more accurately, between war and culture — affects not only those discourses directly instrumental in facilitating the war effort, but also the general cultural context that provides the interpretive framework which endows war with meaning, sanctioning its occurrence. The relationship between language and military deeds must be reconceived. Words, ideas, images constitute the discursive support for military conflict; they should be understood not as though they were mere froth without consequences, but as crucial aspects of the destructive reality of violent conflict itself.
Both events are the object of a continued theoretical debate that raises the question of whether the horror of these experiences can be represented.
They feed out imaginations with the big abstractions of war — Heroism, Fame, Valor, Glory; they make death sentimental and battle melodramatic.
The rules of genre imposed by the epic tradition define a horizon of expectations that is so familiar as to make war harmless and easy to assimilate.
Even though one of the common issues shared by war studies and Holocaust research is the view that the horror of the event is beyond words, and even though one of the most repeated topoi of war narratives is the statement that you cannot understand unless you have been there, the epic story promises a semblance of historical knowledge embedded in an ideological construct.
Writing war involves doing battle with writing and reality, and requires the writer to Aporias of the war story 33 confront the conflict inherent in the difference between representation and experience. In other words, when we examine the tradition of war representation we discover how the conventions of its poetics constitute a system of rhetorical figuration which attempts to contain — that is, accommodate and restrain — a chaotic experience and subject it to an order that endows it with meaning.
Such accounts, like almost all historical writing, are narrative in that they elaborate story lines as a way of making sense of experience.
What is at stake is the — at least possible — irreducibility of experience to discourse, and at the same time the fact that experience is always communicated in a mediated form. It is at the moment of representation that the conventions governing the form itself take on an ideological charge. The recognition of the ideological implications of a repertoire of representational resources forces us to address the issues not only in terms of fictionality or truth, of faithfulness to historical events, but in terms of rhetoricity and of the history of modes of representation.
This also means that any opposition between a politically committed version of cultural studies and a purely theoretical concern with the rhetoricity of the discourses is a false one, as what we read, and what we read into something, is inseparable from how we read.
We need to pay close attention to modes of indirect statement as ways of transgressing epic conventions. For example, one could say, aporetically, that in Guernica allegory enables Picasso to convey the meaninglessness of war. One way of undermining the possibility of assigning an epic meaning to the war story is to deconstruct its narrative structure, making it impossible to make sense of the story in a logical or teleological way. My choice of examples is determined by their use of this strategy.
Before the Rain is not about the war in Bosnia, but about ethnic struggle in a village in Macedonia, where in fact in there had been no war. Thus, this imaginary or potential war — the war to come, like the rain about to fall throughout the film — signifies the actual civil war nearby.
In other words, indirect statement — poetic figuration — is the resource chosen to allow a distancing from the representation of the historical event, in order to address the issues of violence and conflict from a broader perspective. The connection of the Balkan struggle with other wars and with a wider European context is achieved in the film by using London as the setting where the whole middle section takes place. And also through the character of Aleksander, the tormented, Pulitzer-Prize-winning war photographer, who resigns from his job with a British agency, leaves his British lover, Anne, and returns to his home village in Macedonia.
Without cookies your experience may not be seamless. No institutional affiliation. LOG IN.
Romance Notes. In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content: W ho is a witness?
If you would like to authenticate using a different subscribed institution that supports Shibboleth authentication or have your own login and password to Project MUSE. Additional Information.
Project MUSE Mission Project MUSE promotes the creation and dissemination of essential humanities and social science resources through collaboration with libraries, publishers, and scholars worldwide.
Contact Contact Us Help.